Mars Exploration News  
Afghan War Problems

"The local population has now come to identify international troops with eradication activities rather than with reconstruction efforts."
by William S. Lind
UPI Outside View Commentator
Washington (UPI) May 19, 2006
As rising U.S. and NATO casualty counts attest, the war in Afghanistan is heating up. It is doing so on Afghan time, which is to say slowly. When you have all the time in the world, why hurry?

An April 7, 2006 study by the London-based Senlis Council, "Insurgency in the Provinces of Helmand, Kandahar and Nangahar," paints a somewhat alarming picture. I do not know who or what the Senlis Council represents, or what axes it may grind. The style of the report suggests English is not the first language of those who wrote it. But facts are still facts, and its report tracks with what I've seen elsewhere. The report states:

"The Insurgency Assessment Report collates notes, evidence and facts gathered during a field visit of the three provinces ... during the months of February/March 2006.

"The visit was conducted by an independent field team, which met with civil, military and religious leaders in each of the provinces but also gained access to farming communities and other grassroots actors, with whom interviews and group meetings were conducted."

Speaking of all three provinces, the study says in its Executive Summary that government control over the Pashto Belt, even at a limited level, is rapidly diminishing, with political volatility now reaching urban areas.

Volatility indicators -- such as the free movement of insurgent groups in daylight and in the main cities -- reveal that increasingly large areas of the south are falling under the influence of non-state actors.

At the core of this failure by the United States, NATO and the Afghan government is a common and often fatal military phenomenon: conflicting objectives. On the one hand, the United States and its allies want to defeat the Taliban and other "terrorists." But at the same time, they also want to stop opium production. If the Senlis Council's analysis is accurate, attempts to pursue the second objective are pushing us away from attaining the first.

Looking at Helmand province, the report says, "In eliminating the sole survival strategy of many of the farming families, eradication in Helmand is fueling the insurgency. Anti government forces are winning over the dilapidated farmers by offering economic assistance including the cancellation of debts and providing military protection from eradication.

"The Coalition forces' mandate covers counter insurgency and support to counter narcotics activities. It is being widely reported that eradication activities are being supervised by the U.S. and British military...

"Eradication is blunting counter insurgency efforts by pushing the local population toward the extremists...

"The local population has now come to identify international troops with eradication activities rather than with reconstruction efforts."

The situation in the other two provinces is similar. Speaking of Kandahar province, the report states, "The majority of the Kandahar population are farmers living in rural areas. The farming communities of Kandahar are very actively involved in the cultivation and production of opium. The soil, weather patterns and limited water supply make opium one of the few viable crops in the region, and Kandahar farmers admitted that (they) would rather die than forgo their families' only means of survival...

"According to many farmers, the U.S. and Canadian alternative livelihoods plans are farcical..."

Determining strategic objectives, and ensuring that those objectives are not contradictory, is the job of the most senior level of command, in this case the White House. By demanding that U.S. and allied troops pursue two conflicting objectives simultaneously, the Bush administration has created a no-win situation. Efforts to defeat the Taliban only work if they can gain the support of the rural population, but poppy eradication pushes the rural population toward the Taliban and its allies.

One could add a third incompatible objective, promoting women's rights in a conservative Islamic culture.

President George W. Bush likes to say, "I'm the decider; I decide." The role of being the "decider" includes making sure that decisions are logically consistent.

Bush is, from that perspective, a failed "decider" in Afghanistan. He failed similarly in deciding to invade Iraq as part of a global war against "terrorism," when the destruction of the Iraqi state proved, predictably, to work in favor of the "terrorists." He is failing yet again in picking quarrels with Russia and China when we need an all-states alliance against anti-state forces.

President Harry S. Truman said, "The buck stops here," in the Oval Office. When it comes to deciding on strategic objectives, President Bush has torn the buck into confetti and tossed it to the winds of chance.

William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation. United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.

Source: United Press International

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
- The Long War - Doctrine and Application



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Britian May Reform Human Rights Law To Enable Deportations
London (UPI) May 18, 2006
British Home Secretary John Reid insisted Wednesday that human rights law would no longer prevent the government from deporting terror suspects, extremists and other foreign criminals. In a sustained attack on the criminal justice system, he pledged to rebalance it to favor public security over the rights of the individual.









  • Could NASA Get To Pluto Faster? Space Expert Says Yes - By Thinking Nuclear
  • NASA plans to send new robot to Jupiter
  • Los Alamos Hopes To Lead New Era Of Nuclear Space Tranportion With Jovian Mission
  • Boeing Selects Leader for Nuclear Space Systems Program

  • NASA Lunar Orbiter Mission Moves To Next Step
  • China Likely To Launch Moon Probe Next April
  • India Hoping To To Unveil Space Prowess Before NASA
  • China To Launch Satellites For Lunar Surveying

  • NASA Ames Hosting Sally Ride Science Festival
  • Russia To Double Soyuz Rocket Output And Boost Glonass GPS Constellation
  • International Workshop Eyes Cooperative Solar System Exploration
  • Japan space sneakers are ultra-high heels

  • Trio Of Neptunes And Their Belt
  • New Model Could Explain Eccentric Triton Orbit
  • New Horizons Taking Exploration To Edge Of Sol
  • Xena Poses A Bright Mystery

  • The Pull Of Jupiter
  • Hubble Takes Sharpest Shot Yet Of New Red Spot On Jupiter
  • Hitting Europa Hard Could Have A Real Impact
  • Solar Wind Whips Up Auroral Storms On Jupiter And Saturn

  • Venus Express Reaches Final Mission Orbit
  • Venus Express Transmits First Images
  • ESA Spacecraft Prepares To Lift Venusian Veil
  • Europe Places Spacecraft In Orbit About Venus

  • Cassini Captures Another Stunning Saturnian Vista
  • The Sands Of Titan
  • Cassini Takes Sharper Look At Xanadu
  • Scientists Compile Huygens Descent Movies

  • SPACEHAB Subsidiary Wins Spacecraft Facility Study
  • JPL To Hold Small Business Space Symposium In Virginia
  • New NASA Software Fosters Collaborative Engineering
  • Revolutionary Japanese LED makes light work

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement